Oscar History

The Film Experience™ was created by亚博主页Nathaniel R.Gemini,Cinephile,Actressexual.All material herein is written and copyrighted by Nathaniel or a member ofour teamas noted.

Powered by Squarespace
Don't Miss This!
Comment Fun

RIPPeter Fonda

"He should've totally won the Oscar for his sensitive and subtle turn inUlee's Gold"-Claran

"You're right,it is hard to look beyondEasy Riderin most assessments of his career,so it's great to hear more about these other films..."-Edward

Keep TFE Strong

We're looking for500...no461 Patron Saints!If you read us daily,please be one.Your suscription dimes make an enormous difference.Consider...

I ♥ The Film Experience亚博主页



Directors ofFor Sama

Lulu Wang(The Farewell)
Ritesh Batra(Photograph)
Schmidt & Abrantes(Diamantino)
Wanuri Kahiu(Rafiki)
Jia Zhang-ke(Ash is Purest White)

What'cha Looking For?
« First and Last,Temporary| Main| Genie Awards: It's "Incendies"and the Red Carpet »
Mar 13 2011

Meet Me in St.Louis (1944)

To honor the passing of the great songwriterHugh MartinFriday at 96 years of age,a repost of a review of one of my 100 favorite movies,a member of mypersonal canon.(If you joined us after 2008 you can pretend it's a new essay!) Imagine giving the world such perfectly crafted enduring gifts as "Have Yourself a Merry Little Christmas"and "The Trolley Song".R.I.P.Mr.Martin.

Meet Me in St.Louis"The Blossoming of Judy Garland"

Meet Me in St.Louis(1944)
Directed by Vincente Minnelli;Written by Irving Brecher and Fred F Finklehoffe from the novel "5135 Kensington"by Sally Benson;Starring Judy Garland,Mary Astor,Leon Ames,Margaret O'Brien,Lucille Bremer,Harry Davenport,June Lockhart,Tom Drake and Marjorie Main;Production & Distributor Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM);Released 11/28/1944

It's Summer 1903 in Missouri and the Smith family are buzzing about the World's Fair coming to their town the following spring.Teenage daughters Rose (Lucille Bremer) and Esther (Judy Garland) are dreaming about proposals from handsome men,the eldest son Lonnie (Henry H Daniels Jr) is off to college and the father Lon (Leon Ames),a junior partner at a law firm,is about to tell the family that they're all relocating to New York Ci -- oh,but let's stop there.For any plot summary of Meet Me in St.Louis does the movie a great disservice.This classic musical isn't plot driven at all so much as a series of three seasonal vignettes of family life: Summer,Autumn and Winter with the following Spring in 1904 serving as a coda.Almost all of what might be called "plot"in Meet Me In St.Louis is imagined.That is to say,that the story drivers are all in the future.One day the family will move to New York.One day Rose,Lonnie,and Esther will be married.One day St.Louis will catch the attention of the nation.In essence the movie is a lovingly rendered still life of a family (and town) on the brink of great changes rather than an animated portrait of the changes themselves.

St.Louis begins smartly in the kitchen,the heart of any home.Mrs.Anna Smith (Mary Astor) and her maid and cook Katie (Marjorie Main) are preparing ketchup.Katie thinks it's too sweet,Anna thinks her husband will like it that way.Various members of the cast scoot through the kitchen sharing their opinions,too.They can't seem to agree on the flavor: too sweet?too sour?too spicy?too watery?Vincente Minnelli the real gourmet cook in the director's chair doesn't have the same problem.He gets everything right.

If the director was nervous about handling his first big budget color feature with a bonafide superstar in the lead role,you'd never know it from the results.Minnelli had only directed two black and white pictures (Cabin in the Sky,see previous article,andI Dood Itboth in 1943) prior to this big break butMeet Me In St Louismoves with such easy confidence,gently in and out of song and book scenes,you'd think he had nothing at all to prove.

Take the terrific economy and pacing --the movie is at once both leisurely and jam packed with comic,musical and dramatic beats -- of the final two scenes that conclude the first and longest act in the movie (Summer 1903).First there's a lengthy party sequence at the Smith home wherein Esther comically tries to seduce "The Boy Next Door"John Pruett (Tom Drake).She's endearingly amateur at seduction though Judy Garland is of course anything but amateurish when it comes to ingratiating herself to the viewer.John accompanies her through her house as she turns off the lights.It's ostensibly her duty but she's makes a huge drawn out production of it -- she's only doing it to set the mood for their first kiss.The amusement of the scene is that Esther doesn't realize she's succeeding and misreads John's nerves and equally adolescent flirting.When he finally hightails it out of her house without the kiss she's been longing for she flips the lights back on,at once.It's a great deflating punchline.The follow up scene,the classic Trolley sequence,repeats the punchline.

Buzz,buzz,buzz went the buzzer
Plop,plop,plop went the wheels
Stop,stop,stop went my heartstrings

As he started to leave,I took hold of his sleeve with my hand
And as if it were planned...he stayed on with me
And it was grand just to stand with his hand holding mine
To the end of the line.
Esther is obviously singing/dreaming about John but hasn't noticed his arrival beside her for the last chorus.On her last joyous note she turns to finds the object of her affections staring her in the face.It totally throws her.Oops!Once again she's more comfortable in the dream than in the reality.It's the perfect performance note to hit for this girl who is not quite yet a woman.

Speaking of which...

Judy Garland was 22 years old whenSt.Louishit theaters.She was already a screen sensation with multiple Mickey Rooney hits andThe Wizard of Ozbehind her.According to reports she was hesitant to take this role,another teenage character,since she had wanted to move into more grown up roles.Esther Smith turned out to be just what she was after all along.The answer was right in front of her.(There's no place like home and all that).

Esther Smith proved the perfect bridge role for one of the greatest stars of all time,taking Garland from teenager to woman both onscreen and off.By the third act (Winter 1903) Esther and John are in the thrall of requited love and faced with rather adult choices about their futures.By the time Esther is singing "Have Yourself a Merry Little Christmas"to her young sister Tootie (Margaret O'Brien),Judy Garland is a grown woman in full bloom and the camera treats her accordingly.By the time the film was released,Garland and Minnelli were in love and living together.It all came together gloriously.ArguablyMeet Me in St.Louis(1944) is the emblematic peak of Garland's film career between her 'star is born' role inThe Wizard of Oz(1939) to,well,A Star is Born(1954) itself.

But all this talk of Judy's blossoming (she was never lovelier onscreen),changing seasons,loving families and screen romances also does a disservice to the spicy flavors within this musical.While it is a sweet nostalgic slice of Americana,it never descends into mere treacly pablum.The Fall 1903 segment adds enough sour to the soup,focusing on the sometimes gruesome antics and morbid imaginations of Esther's young sisters Agnes (Joan Carroll) and particularly Tootie played by child star Margaret O'Brien who received a juvenile Academy Award for her performance --just like her co-star had in The Wizard of Oz.And the delicate balance of flavors continues all through The Winter 1903 segment when Rose and Esther behave badly at a local dance.One particular bit has Esther putting on her first corset.Rather than play up the beauty of her figure,Minnelli and Garland opt to spike the scene with laughs and physical comedy.

I feel elegant but I can't breathe.

Furthermore,the sweetness of Esther and John's romance is tempered with their very un movie-like (if barely acknowledged) realization that they're moving too quickly.The movie never settles for just one flavor.In short,it's delicious.Or,to quote Esther herself,"heavenly...simply heavenly".

For all of the undoubtedly careful mix of moods and delicate character arcs that Minnelli stirs into his career-making hit,the most impressive thing might well be how effortless his achievement plays.With the semi resurgence of the film musical in the Aughts,much has been written about modern audiences hesistation to suspend their disbelief when characters burst into song.Modern musicals still feel a bit tentative,like they're scared to do at all what musicals are best at doing.Today's filmmakers would do well to studyMeet Me In St.Louiswhich fills its central family's life with music: they hum,they sing phrases of songs even when no production number is on the way,they play piano;Music feels as natural here as it's ever felt in a movie.The space between musical performance and acting of the non-singing variety is blissfully blurred.In the Trolley Song sequence already discussed Judy spends the first verse of the song fretting.She's not singing at all,letting the crowd handle the number as she makes her way through the crowded car.By the time she's spotted her would be man running toward the car (He hadn't forgotten her invitation after all!) the sudden lift in her spirits is expressed quite naturally by her joining in...Everyone else is singing,why shouldn't she?There's another wonderful moment late in the film which I think best expresses Minnelli's graceful direction through performance,plot and song.Mr and Mrs Smith have had a row over the family's impending move to New York and their children have already exited the scene in anger.The mother and father begin to make peace at the piano.And as the father's voice lifts,the sisters are all gently coaxed back into frame,with unspoken forgiveness on their minds.It's a beautiful grace note in an altogether heavenly movie.A

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (6)

I'm going to have to watch this peach of a movie again this week!Maybe I'll find a St.Louis virgin.It'll be my good deed for March.

March 13,2011 | Unregistered CommenterTikabelle

Tikabelle -- that would be awesome.spread the word.It's such a beautiful movie.I went to a wedding last month and the father of the bride referenced this movie and he even said in his speech that he was worried nobody had seen it to understand what he was referring to.I forget to tell him during the reception after that i appreciated the thought.

March 13,2011 | Registered CommenterNATHANIEL R

Lovely.I dare say I only finally caught up with this movie about three years ago,but I've watched it many times since.I'm always so amazed by how incredible Judy looks.Like a doll.Like she's not even real.

March 14,2011 | Unregistered CommenterKurtis O

Great essay on a great movie.I have a lot of respect for a songwriter who could write songs that people still take such delight in years later.Minnelli makes such visually beautiful movies.This one has one of my favorite houses in the movies.I could live there happily,couldn't you?

March 14,2011 | Unregistered Commenteradri

adri -- totally.the house is beautiful.this is seriously the best movie in terms of nostalgia -- maybe because it was a period piece and dedicated to its own sense of American family?-- but it's just so comforting without being pandering.love love love it.it's like you can feel the heat from the soup on the stove.

March 14,2011 | Unregistered CommenterNathaniel R

@Nathaniel: I am in absolute agreement with you regarding current filmmakers' tentative approach to making modern musicals.One would think they'd realize that the more quickly and organically they establish song-and-dance as a function of storytelling the more receptive audiences would be to yielding themselves to the world created within the film.If you have decided to make a musical,it's safe to assume it's for people who enjoy them,so don't be so apologetic about it (*cough*"Dreamgirls"*cough*).

March 15,2011 | Unregistered CommenterTroy H
Comments for this entry have been disabled.Additional comments may not be added to this entry at this time.