SAG Nominations Are In!
Wednesday, December 11, 2013 at 10:08AM
Glenn Dunks in Best Ensemble, Dallas Buyers Club, Oscars (13), Robert Redford, SAG, Yaya DaCosta, precursor awards

Good morning Oscar watchers. This morning brings one of the biggest precursors of the season: the Screen Actor's Guild. These days the eventual Oscar cross-over is usually somewhere between "very hot" (19/20 for 2009) to "very warm" (17/20 in 2011 and 2010) so you can guarantee a large number of the below nominees will show up on Oscar ballots in January.

What are we thinking will cross over? What will fall out? Will tomorrow's Golden Globe nominations (!!!) erase whatever momentum that some of today's nominees have amassed (we're looking at youAugust: Osage CountyandLee Daniels' The Butler)? They just announced the stunt ensemble awards (still not important enough to be read on the main nominations by the likes of Clark Gregg and Sacha Alexander, apparently) and we'll update as they go.

杰出的表现ance by a Cast

Four of these were expected, but the inclusion ofDallas Buyers Clubis interesting. I had long thought that McConaughey was maybe not as locked and loaded as people assumed, but I guess the film is resonating. It also has the smallest nominated cast from any of the five films.

Most annoying "I'm not a big name so I wasn't included in the cast nominations despite being in more of the movie" this time around is *clearly* the omission of Yaya Alafia fromLee Daniels' The Butler. But at least Mariah Carey is now a two-time SAG nominee so who's laughing now (even if her inclusion here over Alafia, along with Redgrave and Pettyfer especially is absurd). It's as if SAG themselves don't realise that the credits of a movie are as managed as everything else and that it's all about who has the better agent or who has the more fame. If Alafia's role had been played by someone more famous, I have no doubt they'd be nominated alongside actors with one 20th of the screentime. Joe Reiddutifully listed all the actorswho could have a rightful claim to a nomination including Alafia, Taran Killam inTwelve Years a Slave(他的好友在影片中,猛冲McNairy, nominated) and Kevin Rankin as the homophobic rodeo pal inDallas. One I hadn't noticed was Colleen Camp inAmerican Hustleand now I'm just gonna go spiral into deep madness.

You don't get a SAG nomination, and YOU don't get a SAG nomination, and YOU don't get a SAG nomination...

杰出的表现ance by a Male Actor in a Leading Role

On one hand, I am not at all surprised to see Whitaker nominated. He's incredibly well-liked (he's got his hands in several of this year's contenders alone), he's good in a role that takes him from baby-faced to old man, and the film was obviously popular. On the other hand, I'm surprised at the omission of Robert Redford since, well, he literally had to act all by himself. Dialogue and interaction are apparently the way to avoid that, I guess, since Sandy Bullock was nominated forGravitywith no problem. It's long felt like there were 7 actors gunning for five slots (withWolf of Wall Streetclearly not seen widely enough since Jonah Hill also missed in a relatively open supporting actor field) so maybe it's Redford that's most vulnerable? But I wonder... does Redford get nominated in the stunt ensemble? I mean, hediddo a lot of his own stunts. Hmmm. Hanks definitely needed this as the critics awards were not going for the film.

杰出的表现ance by a Female Actor in a Leading Role

A bit ot a yawn roster in thatit's been the presumed Oscar shortlist for weeks now. We just gotta hope that tomorrow's Golden Gobe nominations inject some fresh blood into the non-critics discussion especially for Exarchopoulos who'll really need GG and BAFTA to get behind her if she hopes to squeeze out one of these ladies.

杰出的表现ance by a Male Actor in a Supporting Role

I've given up pretending that awards bodies care about category fraud, but it's still a grievance. Brühl and Gandolfini are arguably co-leads (in the case of the former I'd say inarguably). As somebody said on Twitter, the whole roster of nominees feels like "two weeks ago", which makes sense given the ballots were probably cast then. Brühl may be this year's Hilary Swank: nominated here and nowhere else. Are people really remembering that film fondly enough? I find that hard to believe (although, it is a two-time SAG nominee with the stunt cast so maybe I'm wrong).

杰出的表现ance by a Female Actor in a Supporting Role

Yeah, this is what we expected. Can Julia and Meryl survive the tumultuous response to their film and make it to Oscar? I'd love to see Roberts' talent once again justified after 13 years of bickering over her Oscar win, but this is a lead role. And without her this might have been the rarest thing: a supporting category with no lead roles in it! At this stage I'm thinking theFruitvale Stationladies Spencer and Diaz might be out with Oscar. The film didn't get a single nomination today and tomorrow's Globes prospects look grim.

杰出的表现ance by a Stunt Ensemble

This is what happens when Hollywood offers up some blockbuster garbage. TheX-Menfilms have been nominated here before (First Classwas a stunt ensemble nominee) andAll is Lostis a curious nominee, but the other three seem like solid choices that likely wouldn't have been there if it weren't for so many of Hollywood's big summer blockbusters not being very good. Isn't it curious how little awards attention饥饿游戏movies get? Last year's original only received a costume guild nomination and I thought maybeCatching Firemay have caught on here.

Conclusion:So what are we thinking? I think the Redford omission is the biggest surprise of the morning. Personally, I think we'll be looking at another year of red hot cross-over with Oscar. Between 17-19 out of 20 (I don't think Brühl will last to Oscar, maybe Gandolfini, Whitaker or Roberts, too), I'd say. And I really hope we can avoid any "Wolf of Wall Streetshould have screened earlier" nonsense. Let's say "Awards shouldn't be so quick out the gate without having seen big contenders", instead.

Article originally appeared on The Film Experience (//
See website for complete article licensing information.