Oscar History

The Film Experience™ was created by亚博主页Nathaniel R.Gemini,Cinephile,Actressexual.All material herein is written and copyrighted by Nathaniel or a member ofour teamas noted.

Powered by Squarespace
Don't Miss This!

"Great Moments in Horror Actressing"SIGOURNEY WEAVER in COPYCAT

Comment Fun


"AbsoluteYES!Queen Saoirse is coming for her Oscar!"-Wesley

"Look,I understand what Gerwig is trying to do but this is much moreNOthan "yes"for me.Much more."-H

"MAYBE SOI think I would have preferred Gerwig's take on a modern retelling."-Pam

Keep TFE Strong

We're looking for500...no461 Patron Saints!If you read us daily,please be one.Your suscription dimes make an enormous difference.Consider...

I ♥ The Film Experience亚博主页



Directors ofFor Sama

Lulu Wang(The Farewell)
Ritesh Batra(Photograph)
Schmidt & Abrantes(Diamantino)
Wanuri Kahiu(Rafiki)
Jia Zhang-ke(Ash is Purest White)

What'cha Looking For?
« Finding a Waitress in Paris: Hollywood Takes Over Broadway| Main| Fairie Dust Placeholder »
Dec 02 2014

Team FYC: Under the Skin for Visual Effects

Editor's Note: For the next ten days,we'll be featuring individual Team Experience FYC's for various longshots in the Oscar race.We'll never repeat a film or category so we hope you enjoy the variety.And if you're lucky enough to be an AMPAS,HFPA,SAG,Critics Group voter,take note!Here'sAmiron Under the Skin.

Generally speaking,if you drop the adjectiveBestand replace it withMost,you come to a better understanding of what the Academy Awards are often about."

That statement is taken from Nick Davis' review ofThe Lives of Otherswritten several years ago,but it's a sentiment I have not only shared,but have come to recognize as the defining element of my relationship with the Oscars,亚博主页responsible for the bulk of my disagreements with their choices.Nick called the application of his theory to the visual effects category "self-explanatory"and it's hard to disagree with him.How often do we find nominees in this category that subtly work their visual effects into the narrative?Filmmakers who employ effects as a storytelling device rather than a show-stopping juggernaut of colors and flying objects?This isn't to say that some worthy work hasn't been rewarded in the process.No one can argue with the impressive quality of what is on display inGravity,but the emphasis is on "on display."Visual effects in Cuaron's films are equivalent to an oiled up body in a tight thong,flexing muscles in your face,and that type of "most"visual effects is what the Academy has come to reward repeatedly,even when the results aren't quite as impressive or innovative,which brings me to this year.

None of the films that are bound to be nominated in this category will have imagery that is as iconic or memorable as the understated work inUnder the Skin.Yet,Jonathan Glazer's masterpiece – his third from three tries – faces two very big hurdles on its road to nomination.First,the film isn't in the Academy's wheelhouse or likely to get any other nominations.Second,that the visual effects aren'tshowy.In the words of its VFX supervisor,Dominic Parker,the techniques "are supporting the film,not the main event."

Technically,Under the Skinisn't doing anything that Kubrick didn't do fifty years ago;one particular sequence – the disintegration of one of Alien's preys,which is the only colourful segment in the film – unmistakably mirrors the colored vortex sequence in2001: A Space Odyssey.But the application,completely at the service of the story and actively designed to go unnoticed,is what makes the experience memorable.

The plain black void in which the alien's victims,lit in blue hues,float endlessly until their moment of implosion is the year's most terrifying,unshakable imagery.The sense of inescapable horror that these sequences create is precisely due to their sleek emptiness.Similarly,the emotional gravity of the final moment,a literal stripping to bare the soul,or lack thereof,is conveyed with such weight because of the simplicity of the non-obstructive effects.Still,one need not look further than the film's opening "creation"scene to see the genius of the effects.Glazer and his team trimmed down the concept of this scene from the formation of a full human body to just the eye and ended up with sheer minimalist brilliance.The gradual,shocking revelation of what it is we're witnessing is the most wondrous sensation in the film,a moment of genuinely awe-inspiring quality.Here's hoping Academy voters take note.

Previously on Team FYC
The Homesman for Cinematography

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (5)

I was HOPING someone would FYC this exact element of the film.Doesn't the Visual Effects Society have an award for Effects in a Supporting Role?This is the PERFECT example of that - brilliant and unforgettable.

Under the Skin should ALSO be in the running for that freaking genius score,too.

December 2,2014 | Unregistered Commenterdenny

So well weitten.I thought Under the Skin might pop up in this FYC series for Scarlet as Best Actress,but this is also a very worthy category for the film.

December 3,2014 | Unregistered CommenterDJDeeJay

YES.That black,oily,man-swallowing pond was the best effect on screen all year.

December 3,2014 | Unregistered CommenterSan FranCinema

Endorse 100%.Would love to see this award go to something other than a blockbuster.The award should honor grace and artistry and not just scale.

December 3,2014 | Unregistered CommenterMichael C.

The opposite end of the spectrum is when a genuinely impressive achievement like The Towering Inferno is not even nominated in a year when the award is inexplicably not competitive.Rather,it is given as an honorary to Earthquake because it sold the gimmick of Sensurround.The movie looks like an apoplectic camera filmed paper carton houses.

December 3,2014 | Unregistered Commenterbrookesboy

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Some HTML allowed: