Oscar History

The Film Experience™ was created by亚博主页Nathaniel R.Gemini,Cinephile,Actressexual.All material herein is written and copyrighted by Nathaniel or a member ofour teamas noted.

Powered by Squarespace
Don't Miss This!

Oscar Chart Updates

Comment Fun

a look back atKing Kong(1976)

"Worth every dollar spent to mount it on Broadway."-Romy

"It looks fabulous but a love story musical does need two lead that have chemistry or no matter how dazzling the show will not work"-Jaragon

Keep TFE Strong

We're looking for500...no461 Patron Saints!If you read us daily,please be one.Your suscription dimes make an enormous difference.Consider...

I ♥ The Film Experience亚博主页



Directors ofFor Sama

Lulu Wang(The Farewell)
Ritesh Batra(Photograph)
Schmidt & Abrantes(Diamantino)
Wanuri Kahiu(Rafiki)
Jia Zhang-ke(Ash is Purest White)

What'cha Looking For?
« New Podcast: Desperately Seeking Smackdowns| Main| Box Office Three-Way and Dependable Dame Dench »
Oct 03 2017

Doc Corner: Laura Poitras' Risky Business

By Glenn Dunks

There is a knack to watching Laura Poitras' latest film,Risk,her first as a director since winning the Academy Award forCitizenfour.And it's not being abreast of the life and controversies of its on-screen subject,Julian Assange.Although that certainly helps to a point,his journey felt to be of little consequence to me in regards to how I ultimately felt about the movie.The film is messy and often perplexing,no better personified by an utterly surreal and bizarre sequence withLady Gagathat is not kind to either of its participants.

Rather,the key toRisk's success is to not view the film as about Assange at all,but rather  Poitras herself.Sure,the WikiLeaks co-founder is front and centre in the film,and documenting him was the modus operandi,but as a documentary subject he's often far less interesting than the people that orbit him.I am not unaware that I am cutting Poitras an awful lot of slack here...

It's obvious before even its first scene that this is a compromised film for a liberal filmmaker to be pursuing and this internal struggle is obvious throughout.It's also what makes the finished product entirely fascinating.

Riskis split into what is essentially two very distinct halves.The first begins in 2010 when Poitras chooses to shadow the then predominantly underground figure of Julian Assange who had suddenly come to global prominence for the leaking of classified material obtained by Chelsea Manning.With the aid of WikiLeaks staffer Sarah Harrison,he becomes celebrated and disgraced in equal measure.WhenRiskpremiered at the 2016 Cannes Film Festival,it was apparently far more sympathetic.But here is whereRiskdiverts from not just the norm for documentary,but swiftly swerves from what is considered documentarian 101.

A series of personal conflicts with Assange and Jacob Applebaum,a WikiLeaks supporter who Poitras also dated,resulted in a blatant conflict of interest for Poitras.She remodelled the film to be more critical of Assange,questioning his conduct as he holed himself up in the Ecuador consulate of England under threat of extradition to Sweden on sexual assault charges.Risk's second half is more introspective as she attempts to navigate through her own film the challenging dichotomy of making a film about Julian Assange.His involvement in the election of Donald Trump to the US Presidency seemingly the final nail in the coffin of what was once supposed to be a glowing tribute (well,at least of sorts) to him.She states in voice-over,her voice flat and monotone yet no less steeped in disappointment (as a filmmaker and a human being it would appear),that she hoped she could "ignore the contradictions"and that "this is not the film [she] thought [she] was going to make."

Poitras has spent the years since winning her Oscar predominantly focusing on producing.Her name is attached to the likes ofStrong Island,Nobody Speak: Trials of the Free Pressand the "visual journalism"outletField of Vision,which has offered up some great documentary short films,particularly by women filmmakers like Adele Free Pham'sState of Oregonand Nadia Hallgren'sGavin Grimm Vs.Citizenfouris actually an important part ofRisk's narrative – it was during the production of this film that she received encrypted contacts from somebody who would later be identified as Edward Snowden.

This break inRiskis importantly stylistically almost as much as it is dramatically.A marked shift can be seen in her eye as a filmmaker.Music and sound play a vital part in ratcheting up the tension,the images her camera captures and the way they are constructed begin to have greater purpose and stronger impact.The sombre final act,the final kick in a film that makes it even harder to support Assange no matter how much one might agree with his political actions.

In many ways,Poitras' film goes against all the rules of a documentary.In many ways,that's why it works.Those after a traditional Assange documentary may be disappointed,but those after a film about the creative process will surely find something potent in Poitras' struggles.Whatever the ethics in question,Riskdoesn't so much break them as it does force us to think at least for a moment about how we're all shaped by our biases and how even a filmmaker can be compromised for better or worse.

Release:Currently available to stream onShowtime OnDemandor through the regular online retailers like iTunes and Amazon Instant.

Oscar Chances:Laura Poitras is respected among the doc community and that can go a long way.It's more mixed critical response likely means a nomination will be hard,but Poitras and her subject's infamy could definitely push it into the shortlist.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry.To create a new comment,use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Some HTML allowed: