Oscar History

The Film Experience™ was created by亚博主页Nathaniel R.Gemini,Cinephile,Actressexual.All material herein is written and copyrighted by Nathaniel or a member ofour teamas noted.

Powered by Squarespace
Don't Miss This!

Oscar Chart Updates

Comment Fun

Moulin Rouge!Broadway Review

"Worth every dollar spent to mount it on Broadway."-Romy

"It looks fabulous but a love story musical does need two lead that have chemistry or no matter how dazzling the show will not work"-Jaragon

Keep TFE Strong

We're looking for500...no461 Patron Saints!If you read us daily,please be one.Your suscription dimes make an enormous difference.Consider...

I ♥ The Film Experience亚博主页



Directors ofFor Sama

Lulu Wang(The Farewell)
Ritesh Batra(Photograph)
Schmidt & Abrantes(Diamantino)
Wanuri Kahiu(Rafiki)
Jia Zhang-ke(Ash is Purest White)

What'cha Looking For?
Main| Sweden narrows down Oscar options: true story,sci-fi drama,or gay romance?»
Aug 10 2019

De Laurentiis pt 5: the Schlocky 80s

This week at TFE we've celebrated the centennial of one of cinema's most prolific and legendary producers,Dino De Laurentiis...with look backs athis Italian breakthrough,his expensive taste in60s epics,anAmerican reinvention,and the hubris ofKing Kong.

Here'sChris Feilto wrap things up...

With the exception of Hannibal Lecter,history tends to overlook Dino De Laurentiis genre contributions.In fact whenManhunter(1986) would arrive,Hannibal was somewhat the closing chapter to what Dino would bring in the late 70s and 80s.Instead the interim brought its share of delightful schlock,namely giving David Lynch enduring battle wounds and introducing the world to Arnold Schwarzenegger.I'm talking about the earnest disasterpiecesDuneandConan the Barbarian.

Think of this as the De Laurentiis dessert of our week-long series...

While on the surface it might be easy to leap to schadenfreude with both of these films,but I would say both offer a grand sense of scale and spectacle.For De Laurentiis,they reveal the producer's savvy eye towards broad global appeal,and well before that what considered essential to such genre sagas.We watchDuneandConantoday and see unmitigated disaster,but that has never once kept them out of the cultural consciousness or ceased their endless run on cable television.Call them junk,but they are unpretentious and have captivated audiences for in perpetuity.

...Okay,maybeDuneis a tiny bit pretentious.

But we can just chalk that up to a long-windedness endemic to distilling its beloved brick of a novel into a succinct sci-fi tentpole.David Lynch was brought onto the film by the De Laurentiis family as they were about to lose the rights after courting Ridley Scott.And the result is the stuff of legend,a sometimes interminable mishegos of characters and plot.Look,it's no fun to beat a dead horse or lament the woes of a film that Lynch refuses to talk about.

But aside from its (overly) earnest attempt at cramming its intergalactic geography and endless utterances of "the spice!",you get a sometimes gobsmackingly designed film around it.Certainly inspired in large part by Jodorowsky's concepts when the project was in his hands,the design elements transcend the film's reputation for something that is often astounding to look at.For production value,and yes even vision,it stands among the top of De Laurentiis' legacy.

Dune production artRon Cobb was the production designer on Conan (1982)
MeanwhileConan the Barbarianis like a softcore artifact of male id gone cinematically wild.This one is perhaps harder to defend in its schlocky missteps,but its utter lunacy is part of its lingering charm.Conanhas giant snake puppets,plentiful swordplay,and James Earl Jones in microbangs.It's a movie where Arnold Schwarzenegger does the sex so good that it makes his cave woman partner sprout fangs,forcing Arnold to throw her into a fire before she becomes a laughing meteor and shoots off into the woods,never to be heard from again.

Perhaps elements ofConanseem more low-fi thanDune,but the film was ultimately a much larger financial success.It's pleasures are simple: archetypal leather-clad machismo battling evil in primitive times,vengeance,and campy violence.What makes it most dated is its sexual politics,filled with boobs for its purely male audience.And yet the film feels otherwise unassuming and quaint by today's standards of more grim masculinity.If nothing else,Dino deserves credit for launching a major star of the decade despite his categorical inability to act.

When considering his legacy,it's important to remember Dino De Laurentiis' influence as a fantasy filmmaker,how he launched big scale visions that could make audiences happy over the decades - no matter how silly they may seem.

return to part 1

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (2)

I'd say the "Ahnold's inability to act"thing isn't entirely wrong,but definitely...overstated?I mean,Total Recall?Yeah,personally,that's not a performance that says "I have ZERO acting talent".There's a wide gulf between "no acting talent"and "one of the greats."Ahnold that gulf.Maybe closer to the former than the latter,but not absolutely talentless.

August 10,2019 | Unregistered CommenterVolvagia

I can't stand this writeup.It"s the same queer detached response to genre when it's not aimed at baby queens.

August 10,2019 | Unregistered Commenter/3rtful

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Some HTML allowed: