Oscar History

The Film Experience™ was created by亚博主页Nathaniel R.Gemini,Cinephile,Actressexual.All material herein is written and copyrighted by Nathaniel or a member ofour teamas noted.

Powered by Squarespace
Don't Miss This!

Oscar Chart Updates

Comment Fun

Weekend Box OfficeWhat did you see?

"SawThe Kitchenand was disappointed.There was absolutely no style."-Ryan

"I would be more optimistic aboutThe Farewellif any of last year's deserving summer A24 releases,did better with the Academy."-Suzanne

"Scary Storiesis fun but not exactly great.It also has a confused but very intriguing relationship with history"-Dave

Keep TFE Strong

We're looking for500...no461 Patron Saints!If you read us daily,please be one.Your suscription dimes make an enormous difference.Consider...

I ♥ The Film Experience亚博主页



Directors ofFor Sama

Lulu Wang(The Farewell)
Ritesh Batra(Photograph)
Schmidt & Abrantes(Diamantino)
Wanuri Kahiu(Rafiki)
Jia Zhang-ke(Ash is Purest White)

What'cha Looking For?
« Top Ten: Alfred Hitchcock Movies| Main| Review: Dora and the Lost City of Gold »
Aug 13 2019

The New Classics: Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol

by Michael Cusumano

Scene: Scaling the Burj Khalifa
In the course of writing this column,I eventually got around to asking myself the inevitable question:  "What is the 21st century scene I've watched the most times?"

I knew with certainty that the answer was the Burj Khalifa scene from Brad Bird'sMission Impossible: Ghost Protocol,even if I couldn't immediately account for the why.Of course you could simply say "Why not?"It's already firmly established in the pantheon of great action scenes.But it's not like the past two decades have seen a dearth of great action filmmaking.Why not "Ship's Mast"fromDeath Proofor the centerpiece car chase fromDrive?What exactly is it about Tom Cruise pawing his way up the side of the world's tallest building?

It's not merely the gasp-inducing location,although the great Robert Elswit makes memorable use of it,providing no end of effectively vertiginous compositions.And it's not just the fact that Cruise really dangled himself out there a hundred stories in the air,although the scene would be diminished were it not for Maverick's mania for doing his own stunts.

I think the reason I respond to the scene the way I do is because it wows me first and foremost as a piece ofwriting.There is something so deep down satisfying about Bird's way with set-ups and pay-offs.It has the cleanness of a balanced equation.

It's said the difference between good writing and bad writing is whether you can separate the events of the plot with "therefore/but"or "and then".If you can use "therefore/but"there is a conflict and escalation,whereas if you use "and then"you have a series of disconnected stuff happening.So many modern action scenes are a big pile of "and then."They can distract from that fact with spectacle and gags,but we know an "and then"sequence when we get one.And while that kind of screenwriting can be killer in a trailer,it's less engaging in the context of the film,and absolutely deadly on repeat viewings.

A "therefore/but"sequence,on the other hand,actually improves with familiarity,and the Burj Khalifa sequence is a supreme example.Cruise and his team are setting a trap for a maniac trying to acquire nuclear weapons THEREFORE they need to control the tower's computer system BUT security is such that the only way they can access the server room is from the outside THEREFORE Ethan Hunt has to scale the world's tallest building with some hi-tech gloves BUT they malfunction while he's stuck to the side of the building… and so on,and so on.The sequence has some set-ups so subtle you didn't even realize you were getting them until they payoff.Like the sparking glass cutter used to remove the window so Ethan can start his ascent.It reappears outside the server room to spark again and send Ethan plummeting.The whole thing is like a Fred Astaire dance sequence,no wasted moves,and light on its feet despite the rigorous precision.

And it's that lightness that really sets the scene apart.It actually features a terrific under-the-radar deadpan comedic performance from Cruise as he absorbs one mind-bogglingly terrifying development after another.Which brings up another reason the sequence works so well: It allows Cruise to be scared.Oh sure,he does whatever insane action hero gambit is required,and were you or I stuck in a room on the 130th floor,we'd stay there and politely starve to death before we hurled ourselves out the window with a hastily improvised rope.But prior to all the heroics Ethan does everything he can to NOT go out that window and when that makeshift rope proves too short he allows himself a flicker of panic.Those beats are what sell the suspense even if we know with 1000% certainty the sequence won't end with an Ethan Hunt stain splatted across the Burj Khalifa's parking lot.Harrison Ford understood those beats.The Indiana Jones series is a procession of Ford being scared shitless.

The final element that pushes this sequence over the top for me are the little grace notes that Bird sprinkles throughout.Like the way Ethan Hunt malfunctioning glove blows away on the wind only to reappear,stuck further up the tower,or the way the film takes the famous Tom Cruise Run and transposes it into a vertical plunge down the side of the building.One could argue McQuarrie matchedGhost Protocol's action in his twoMission Impossiblesequels,but I don't believe any other entry has equaled Bird's wit.He nails that elusive tone where he revels in the joy of the whole mad endeavor without sacrificing any of the dramatic urgency.

previously on The New Classics

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry.To create a new comment,use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Some HTML allowed: