Film Bitch History
Oscar History
Welcome

亚博主页电影体验™被创造Nathaniel R. Gemini, Cinephile, Actressexual. All material herein is written and copyrighted by Nathaniel or a member of我们的队伍as noted.

Powered by Squarespace
Don't Miss This!

GAY USA (1977)-a must-see doc restored

Comment Fun

谁与争锋(2002)-the最差的债券或低估?

“这个写了这样一个令人惊喜,因为我还没有想过这个电影这么久。”迈克Newq

“这部电影是不得人心主要是为了在目前的过顶装模作样邦德电影时所流行的走出去。”-丹尼

"Well now I really, really want to see this again. I can remember very little about it other than Halle Berry's bikini and Rick Yune's cheekbones." -戴夫

Interviews

Zainab Jah & Jayme LawsonFarewell Amor
Eliza HittmanNever Rarely
服装设计师滑稽角色
放映技师The Irishman
Songwriters冷冻II

Keep TFE Strong

我们正在寻找500... no461个守护神If you read us daily, please be one.Your suscription dimes make an enormous difference.Consider...

我♥电影亚博主页体验

THANKS IN ADVANCE

What'cha Looking For?
订阅
«怎么过我从来没有见过......‘恋恋模范生’?|Main|2002: Isabelle Huppert and the "8 Women" »
星期五
12 2020

十大最佳影片提名再次!

通过纳撒尼尔ř

啊...规则每年的调整是在我们一次。学院先后被狂热设法跟上社会的变化,并与他们的性别平等和种族多样性inititiatives在几年过去少数取得了不少进展。我们也看到,本来似乎是不可能的前十年如最佳影片获得者月光(2016)和寄生物(2019). The Academy is continuing with their diversity initiatives over the next five yearswhich you can read about herewe won't attempt to summarize it as it's definitely in the planning rather than implementing stages. But a lot of it sounds really smart like unconscious bias training and screenings and discussions and industry-focused inititatives (as we've long said, the Academy can only vote on the films that Hollywood actually makes!).

不过也有两个消息混凝土块,我们必须讨论...

在最近的历史上最著名的调整是不会因有关种族多样性和性别平等,但对各种电影奥斯卡愿意兑现的范围担忧促使。年复一年奥斯卡只是坚持自己的消息电影和传记片和战争片和威望电视剧。这些类型的电影还是很受奥斯卡--their味道是他们的口味为他们的口味 - 但在2009年奥斯卡的5至10预选,扩大种膜的净希望扩大了最佳影片字段,可能兑现。将扩大的领域帮助他们避免非典型的爱人一样的未来尴尬完封The Dark KnightandWall*E(both of which were wildly acclaimed and received numerous BEST raves but couldn't crack a very retro feeling list of 5 Best Picture nominees in 2008 that nobody outside of the Academy seemed all that excited about.)

The expansion worked at first allowing more sci-fi films and comedies and LGBTQ films and animated films in. That tweak was in place for just two years (2009 & 2010), after which they moved to a sliding scale based on percentages of votes.

目前的系统允许5个10最佳影片提名之间的任何地方。但在九年该系统已到位迄今我们只看过8或9最佳影片提名。我们也看到被提名整体在工艺类别,如电影少一些不幸的副作用仿佛展开的最佳影片名单实际上在缩小自己的筛选栈选民的兴趣,他们注重的是总体大约一打候选人。该学院有没有计划ADDRES当然这个问题,因为它很难解释,甚至量化,但它是事实(看看去年的奥斯卡颁奖典礼的增加数额提名最佳影片播放器的一个令人吃惊的例子,很少其余为别人亚博主页。)

这已经不是什么秘密,我们有时错过了5 wide lists, which felt more 'special' and statistics-interesting, but we'd prefer an even 10 to the sliding scale (which is too messy/inconsistent -- yes, we're looking at you Emmys). So we're happy to report that the sliding scale expansion experiment will end with this upcoming Oscars (dates still in flux due to concerns over COVID-19 and theaters still mostly being closed). The 94th Oscars honoring the films of 2021 will return to that 2009 system of a full top ten list!What'cha觉得呢?

最后...

Here's one initiative that we're VERY excited and shocked about that might help with some long-standing problems we thought Oscar would never address. A quote from the Academy:

The Academy will alsoimplement a quarterly viewing processthrough the Academy Screening Room, the streaming site for Academy members, also starting with the 94th Academy Awards. By making it possible for members to view films released year-round, the Academy will broaden each film’s exposure, level the playing field, and ensure all eligible films can be seen by voting members.

That change is still a year away but it's long been needed as a way to counter the problems of the December glut and increase the likelihood (even if only a little) that studios will release Oscar-calibre films in all months of the year and not just save them up to dump in a tiny window around Christmas.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

电子邮件电子邮件Article to Friend

Reader Comments (60)

I think and hope quarterly viewings will bring about more diversity in nominations. Ten best picture nominees probably won't affect nominations quite as much.

2020年6月12日|未注册的批评家Cash

真棒消息!10是更有趣,我觉得与它坚持更长的时间将承担美味的水果电影。我喜欢看到严肃的男人,向上和区9在2009年所有被提名的我也是,在最少的时间,很喜欢2010年全年的阵容。尤其是看到玩具总动员3和冬天的骨头可以吹嘘自己是最佳影片提名。

2020年6月12日|未注册的批评家蒂姆

Ten, Ten, Tens across the board for this move Academy!

2020年6月12日|未注册的批评家Werk

The firm ten rule change and the quarterly screenings are such exciting choices. Can’t wait to see how this plays out

2020年6月12日|未注册的批评家Nick T

关于时间,那些早起的鸟儿版本。

2020年6月12日|未注册的批评家markgordonuk

只要打开了电影剧院所以公众可以看到今年的10部电影!

2020年6月12日|未注册的批评家TOM

是否有可能在每季度观看过程还不如让会员看到更多的电影实际上提高了筛选名单的缩小,你在第一点提到的结果呢?

2020年6月12日|未注册的批评家BJT

I think the quarterly shift could be exciting. I think about a film like Get Out, which had a lot of buzz when it was released, but had to do a lot to maintain that buzz throughout the year. Making films more accessible to members year round could make it easier to sustain buzz.

2020年6月12日|未注册的批评家Joe G

I'm sure as most years go I'll be heavily disappointed in a lot of the nominations, but today I bask in the Academy's move toward good decision making. The ten was a great idea, was working well enough and then ceased when things were getting interesting. Then we had an underwhelming 2011 slate, so why not chance it to see if a great film could eke through. Followed by the decent enough 2012 slate (highlighted by Amour getting a Best Picture nom, probably not in a group of five with the Academy despite signs to the contrary) which why not add an extra one and bolster the years reputation further. I believe the very good Skyfall was a chance?

Ugh the awesome news gets me rambling. What a small beacon of escapist hope in small trivial pleasures during these bleak days. Brava Academy!

2020年6月12日|未注册的批评家Laquanda

这是巨大的新闻:一家公司10个提名最佳影片 - 是的,更多的多样性 - 绝对。

2020年6月12日|未注册的批评家阿黛尔

Both of these changes are quite exciting. Personally, I hope the quarterly screenings help movies released earlier in the year to get more Oscar love. However, I'm cautious about hoping too much from the Academy.

再膨胀到十让我不知道电影会被提名为最佳影片,如果十广泛的领域已经从2011年起,而不是提名的波动数保持不变。我最好的猜测是:

2011 - Bridesmaids
2012 - Skyfall
2013 - Blue Jasmine (or Frozen?)
2014 - Foxcatcher & Interstellar
2015 - Carol & Inside Out
2016 - 成龙(?)
2017年 - Mudbound
2018 - If Beale Street Could Talk & The Ballad of Buster Scruggs (I'm very unsure about this year)
2019 - The Two Popes

2020年6月12日|未注册的批评家Cláudio Alves

虽然我还是很怀念的只有5威信 - 我托克宁愿有固定的数量。但究竟会现场看,今年像电影院关闭,不必补10点!?!?

2020年6月12日|未注册的批评家Jamie

这是最近的奥斯卡宣布,我可以说恭喜身体亚博主页。对我来说,每一次他们试图约翰·贝利主持下实施变革收到大反弹,并最终被overtturned,

The changes announced today seem right and show promise for what the academy could accomplish if they make smart choices for change instead of changes for viewership.

2020年6月12日|未注册的批评家Eoin

I hate to break it to everyone, but the Oscars are over. Streaming has taken over and people cannot even go to movie theaters, all the movie stars are old or deceased, so why bother trying to beat a dead horse?

2020年6月12日|未注册的批评家Joan Crawford

圣女,知道你的听众。

2020年6月12日|未注册的批评家帕克

我认为10项提名规则已经实现,但是一个愚蠢的理由,他们只是选择了提名刚刚超过6个竞争者。

The fact of having ten nominees sounds great for me but that could affect the diversity of nominations like happend this year, the films nominated for the big prize was repetitive in the technical categories but I think that the second rule could help to balance that.

2020年6月12日|未注册的批评家César Gaytán

Laquanda:如果我猜什么会,实事求是,填补了空槽2011至2019年?

2011:女孩龙纹身(功能性的提名和许多技术指标仍宁愿谍影行动作为一个惊喜,但它并不完全具备科技股清楚地做到这一点。)
2012: Dicey, and I don't really like either of these, but it's either The Master or Flight.
2013: Blue Jasmine
2014: Foxcatcher (In a flat ten, NO Director Nomination would miss) and...I'm going out on there being, along with Selma, another "this got some fairly major 6th places" (especially Editing and Adapted Screenplay, and MAYBE more than that) limb here, but...Captain America: The Winter Soldier.
2015: Carol and Inside Out.
2016: Zootopia. (Sorry, but I can't really see any of the seven other "big eight" nominees that year (Captain Fantastic, Jackie, Loving, Elle, Florence Foster Jenkins, Nocturnal Animals and The Lobster) making it all the way to Picture.)
2017: I know the safer picks would either be the racism drama Mudbound or the supa cool Baby Driver, but...I'm calling it for the gritty nail-biting deconstruction Logan.
2018: Cold War and Can You Ever Forgive Me?
2019: The Two Popes

2020年6月12日|未注册的批评家Volvagia

The Quarterly Review process is TERRIFIC and I am so glad it's being implemented. Hopefully this will lessen the force and ridiculousness of the barrage of campaigning we see at the end of the year.

But I really am not crazy about the 10-wide best picture change. I was fine with the current system of 5-10 nominees, although my dream is to go back to the 5 rule.

I'm really not sure why everyone is so thrilled with the change. You do realize this is how we got best picture nominees The Blind Side and Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close? I actually think more best picture nominees leads to less quality. Eventually they'll expand all the acting nominees to a 10-wide field and everyone will get an Oscar.

2020年6月12日|未注册的批评家Aaron

I believe when you use a preferential ballot, it programs you to champion your first choices, that's why there's few movies nominated.

I like the idea of the stream services, but the academy should put a survey at the end of every movie in which they mark every category in which they think the movie excels. And before voting for nominations, the service should remind them the movies they marked as great in their categories. And they could only vote for a movie if they saw the whole movie. Otherwise, I have little hope of real change.

2020年6月12日|未注册的批评家Luiserghio

Aaron - I would be happy with 10 acting nominees in each category, and also allowing double nominations for a performer. Maybe with more slots there would be less category fraud.

2020年6月12日|未注册的批评家ken s

Aaron: The Blind Side was probably, and Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close was definitely, a 6-10 nominee, not a flat ten nominee. There are only THREE clearly "flat ten" nominees: A Serious Man, Up and Toy Story 3. Up's my least favourite of those, but other people love it, and it sets the benchmark for Animation fandom in the Academy.

2020年6月12日|未注册的批评家Volvagia

They should stick to five.

2020年6月12日|未注册的批评家Peggy Sue

I miss/prefer the five nominees option, but Ok. Hope this bring more foreign language movies and comedies and indies.

2020年6月12日|未注册的批评家猫正义

不,这不会被提名基于漫画书的帮助影片。[虽然,它帮助黑豹。谢谢。

2020年6月12日|未注册的批评家Fredo

琼·克劳馥好莱坞永远不会这么说.

I'm optimistic more genre work will get in for Best Picture.

2020年6月12日|未注册的批评家forever1267

但是你必须找到ten films that are actually Oscar worthy?

2020年6月12日|未注册的批评家Jaragon

弗雷:喂,是我预测监护人2(砂砾得分:3)或托尔:仙境(砂砾得分:4)?在1-10砂砾规模,黑暗骑士(9),美国队长:冬日战士(7),洛根(10)和黑豹(6)不只是“好”,但也都在粗砂一半超级英雄电影。即使这个重新扩张不会帮助任何其他方式不够好超级英雄电影,这比上该级别的6降低,但平10可以帮助任何足够好的一个,将比分6或更高版本上“坚韧不拔的超级英雄电影”规模。

2020年6月12日|未注册的批评家Volvagia

This is the best news. I feel as good as a front page full of Cláudio articles, that overjoyed and excited.

2020年6月12日|未注册的批评家Jose

Over a large sample size it was found that supporters of five nominees over the superior ten were more likely to be antisocial, belligerent and dabble in many types of bigotry.

因此,考虑到这一点,感到非常高兴的宣布。

2020年6月12日|未注册的批评家Scientiste

我还没有评论有关此之前,但对于寄生虫,作为欧洲我不喜欢nessecary当外国电影赢。你可能会认为这是对的,我应该是什么感觉,但我宁可不要奇外语片获奖或在主项提名,就好像所有其他外国电影不如好莱坞电影。我宁愿如果奥斯卡只是一个亚博主页好莱坞产业仪式(与外国电影或外语片类别)。但是我很想另一国际颁奖典礼,将有同等的威望和非常多样化的获奖者的所有电影。或者,如果至少有EBU安排了欧洲电影一个他们有欧洲电视歌曲大赛的方式(尽管比赛的质量可能不会总是很棒很有趣的时间,促进欧洲的歌曲)。

2020年6月12日|未注册的批评家Chinoiserie

A few tacky staunch ‘fivers’ won’t spoil the elation. Academy making moves and looking good doing it. Ten Again!

2020年6月12日|未注册的批评家丽莎

累了:5或5-10

连线:稳定10

2020年6月12日|未注册的批评家咪咪

I'd say "Knives Out" was tenth last year and not "The Two Popes" but I might be wrong.

“攻其不备” BP提名被撤销了十年的系统,所以它实际上是有趣的变化。

I LOVE the idea of quarterly viewing process. In theory it sounds truly exciting.

2020年6月12日|未注册的批评家TheDrMistery

Scientiste,LOL.

2020年6月12日|未注册的批评家猫正义

我希望学院要求的是一部电影,如果船员的40-50%是女性,而不是白人,尤其是头部部门只能有资格获得奥斯卡奖。亚博主页

我希望他们不要长时间过多地创造了奥斯卡的武术指导。亚博主页

2020年6月12日|未注册的批评家Joe

是10项最佳影片提名仍然要由优先投票系统进行选择?

2020年6月12日|未注册的批评家Marcos

You have to hand it to The Academy. So many issues within the film community regarding representation are far bigger than them, yet they have continued to lead the way in Hollywood on this issue.

2020年6月12日|未注册的批评家安德鲁

so the headline here is about new representation & inclusion standards for Oscar eligibility yet you're just don't want to deal with that. AT ALL. So this is what you "we won't attempt to summarize it as it's definitely in the planning rather than implementing stages."

哇。只是哇

2020年6月12日|未注册的批评家priti

是的,我想这是包括多个电影的方式

2020年6月12日|未注册的批评家Jaragon

It's just all going downhill. Ten films in today's marketplace is the Emmy's.

2020年6月12日|未注册的批评家掠夺

不能等待新的布鲁克林或新的小女人知道,他们永远不会赢!

2020年6月12日|未注册的批评家Lonny

PS,我的建议是,除去戏剧的要求,任何电影没有广告符合条件。该区分并不在现代世界里,一切都流意义了。

2020年6月12日|未注册的批评家掠夺

PRITI -The Academy admits themselves in the press release that those "representation and inclusion standards" (which, you're right, are the headline) are"to be established"so it didn't seem smart to attempt to summarize something that doesn't yet exist.

Other than to state -- as I did -- that the ideas floated (screenings, future initiativies, bias training) seem smart. Be mad about it if you want but really why waste the energy? We're happy they're making these changes.

ANDREW -- i'm proud of them too. They can only vote on what films are made (as we've said for years) so good on them for attempting to be leaders in this so that they have a more diverse pool of films on which to vote.

KEN S -- i think 10 nominees in the acting categories would be disastrous. It would just be everybody in the prestige movies, regardless of quality. my theory at least.

HARRY -- but why would they want to become the Emmys when the Oscars are still more popular?

JARAGON - 总有超过10部影片是奥斯卡值得。我觉得,当选民们说,这是很难填补所有的空间上的选票,他们只是没有看很多电影。

2020年6月12日|注册批评家NATHANIEL [R

The range of diversity and inclusivity initiatives the Academy is developing sounds impressive and I look forward to further announcements.

回复:回迁到十个最佳影片提名:将选民邀请列出了对他们的提名选票十部影片,如在2009年和2010年的情况,或将它们依然被邀请名单只有五,由于一直自2011年以来的情况下?这是关键的区别。清单多达十个意味着选民们的房间列表两种典型的奥斯卡票价(声望戏剧等),更多的是,典型的薄膜(区9,冬天的骨头等)。这一切都来到与2011奥斯卡,当投票允许选民每次只有五个选择结束。亚博主页这将是最好的,我想,如果选民可以再次列出多达十部影片。

2020年6月12日|未注册的批评家爱德华·L.

Edward -- that's a really good point and question. I wonder...

6月13日,2020|注册批评家NATHANIEL [R

Sorry but there is no difference now between Emmy and Oscar. Rami, Laura Dern, these are TV stars.

6月13日,2020|未注册的批评家Juju

Ewww... is there even going to be ten films to be worthy this year? It’s June and I count zero so far

6月13日,2020|未注册的批评家adri

So many people say "there aren't going to be 10 good films to nominate this year!" Doesn't matter. This doesn't go into effect for another year. Did you folks read Nathanial's post carefully or just skim it really fast?

6月13日,2020|未注册的批评家达妮埃拉艾萨克斯

答应了,我更喜欢5或10,把它已有10所有过去的十年里我要说这些电影会弥漫了开插槽:

2011:女孩龙纹身
2012: The Master
2013: Blue Jasmine
2014:狐狸猎手/飘女孩
2015: Carol / Inside Out
2016年成龙
2017: Mudbound
2018: If Beale Street Could Talk / Cold War
2019: The Two Popes

6月13日,2020|未注册的批评家Ryan

2011: The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo
2012:007:大破天幕杀机
2013: Blue Jasmine or Before Midnight
2014:伊达/星际
2015: Carol / Ex Machina
2016: The Lobster or Elle
2017: Logan or Blade Runner 2049
2018:冷战/第一重整
2019:肖像着火夫人

6月13日,2020|未注册的批评家曼努埃尔

岗位发表新评论

输入您的信息下面添加一个新评论。

我的回答是我自己的网站»
作者电子邮件(optional):
作者URL (optional):
岗位:
Some HTML allowed: