Oscar History
欢迎

亚博主页电影体验™被创造Nathaniel R。双子座,Cinephile,Actressexual。本文中的所有材料被写入并享有版权由纳撒尼尔或成员our teamas noted.

Powered by Squarespace
不要将此小姐!
评论Fun

几乎有:泰隆·艾格顿

"Maybe THE best entrance scene of a biopic ever." -Sonja

“有此表现仍念念不忘,这可能会对动辄出了错。”-GShaq

“不受欢迎的意见:我会选埃杰顿了迪卡普里奥,很容易!”-埃德

Interviews

Zainab Jah & Jayme LawsonFarewell Amor
伊丽莎希特曼从不很少
服装设计师滑稽角色
Cinematographer爱尔兰人
Songwriters冷冻II

保持TFE强

我们正在寻找500...没有461个守护神If you read us daily, please be one.你suscription角钱作出巨大的差异。考虑...

我♥电影亚博主页体验

提前致谢

What'cha Looking For?
Subscribe
主要|The many screen faces of Catherine the Great »
星期三
03 2020

家具:在Frida的镜子和迭戈的墙壁

丹尼尔Walber的生产设计系列。点击图片看到他们在放大的细节。

近20年来,茱莉·泰默的弗里达remains both breathtaking (those Quay Brothers puppets!) and befuddling (why isn’t it in Spanish?). It holds up better as a visual experiment than as a biopic, despite the richness of Salma Hayek’s performance. Filmmakers have long struggled to bring the lives of visual artists to the screen in dynamic, resonant ways. Some fail.

When弗里达没有成功,这主要是由于其获得奥斯卡提名的艺术总监费利佩·费尔南德斯·戴尔·帕索和布景哈尼亚罗夫莱多的队伍。他们的工作并不简单代表弗里达·卡罗和迭戈·里维拉,但艺术解释it. By transforming Kahlo’s paintings into the stuff of cinema, they directly engage with their meaning - or, rather, Taymor’s own interpretation of those meanings. The result is a film with a lot to say about materiality and identity, the value of brick and the value of life.

我们首先弗里达的卧床不起的旅程,她在墨西哥城的首次个展。她携带的房子高高的了,头靠在一个绣花枕头,上面写着“阿穆尔”和“泰索罗Mio.”但是,我们看到她通过her眼睛,她仰望镜到她床上的树冠,花儿反映她的背影。

在我们看到她走过无数镜子的电影,这反映了她的艺术,她的生命历程。接下来来后,我们立刻回想起她的青春,她慢慢地从她的1925年复苏巴士意外。

镜子本身从来没有什么好看的,通常由静静地表明她的那些画的纯木制框架的约束。他们跟随弗里达甚至远离她的画布 - 在这里,她是在她的婚礼,通过在衣橱镜精确捕捉。

Initially, the mirrors just reflect. But as Frida’s art develops, her mirrors join her in pursuit of the surreal. After leaving Diego, she returns to her parents’ home and cuts her hair, eyes locked onto this new image of herself.

Then Taymor pulls back, revealing a doorway. Another Frida sits there, a melange of Hayek and the referenced painting. She is dressed identically to the “real” Frida at the mirror, seated on a yellow chair and surrounded by newly discarded locks. The mirror, meanwhile, has found itself resting on an easel. In it we see real-Frida looking at painting-Frida, who in turn looks directly at us.

Through film, the paintings become living refractions of the artist herself. In a later example, Frida paints herself in white, a double that gazes back at her. Then she steps into the painting to join herself on the bench, becoming yet another double. These scenes compound the sheer layers of identity that go into each self-portrait. Bringing them to life underlines their depth and their authority - an authority that Diego doesn’t necessarily understand.

迭戈印象深刻Frida的才华,从他看到她工作的那一刻,但还是告诉她的肖像是过时的,时间的浪费资产阶级。言下之意是,形式,政治和艺术,是壁画。通过历史和政治的广阔表示,墨西哥和世界是可以改变的。他介绍到膜上,同时安装这些项目之一,由他脚手架相形见绌。

To further this point, Taymor prioritizes scenes of Diego at work in actual architectural spaces. His monumental ambitions are an ever-present aspect of his character.

这种轮番模仿,当他和弗里达前往纽约市。她想象他是金刚,攀登帝国大厦,使另一个建筑标志。

迭戈已经委托制作在洛克菲勒中心的壁画,让他们在纽约。但是,当他拒绝编辑出列宁的形象,他的赞助人(爱德华·诺顿纳尔逊·洛克菲勒)及时支付他未完成的工作,然后将它摧毁。

迭戈被摧残,但弗里达告诉他克服它。当然,她只是作为一个致力于革命政治,因为他是。但她认为,迭戈已经赢得了战斗的重要组成部分 - 它不是墙本身的问题,但故事的人会记得和角色,他在里面扮演。

迭戈不同意,当然。当弗里达表明,它的时候回家,他刺一幅画厌恶 - 一个龙舌兰的静物,他认为作为一个艺术轻浮生活的象征。

他们当中哪是正确的?洛克菲勒的故事已经肯定远远活得比未完成的壁画。即使完成,它会一直在公司的一个景观墙基团,由世界最著名的资本家之一支付。然而,这也是迭戈的愿景,唯物主义的斗争到建筑材料的画的一部分。它是从弗里达的自画像,这样的相对微小的理念为自身较为微小的陈述相去甚远 - 至少从Taymor的迭戈的角度。

但弗里达的作品是不是所有真的很小。由于这部影片探讨了出色的设计,她的自画像有一个令人眩晕的深度。他们反映生活本身的愿景,盯着我们的眼睛,弗里达盯着她自己的。他们表现出单身生活的政治价值,特别是她自己的人生价值 - 为她成为女权主义的图标,酷儿的,墨西哥文化的,所以很多被边缘化的身份。

And, perhaps, the way Taymor contrasts this with Diego’s massive muralism echoes into the present moment. What is more valuable, a wall or a face? Is the physical material of our cities more precious than an individual portrait, an individual life? Which is worth our devotion, our energy and our struggle? Where do we take Frida from here?

打印查看打印版

电子邮件电子邮件Article to Friend

Reader Comments (4)

去年我参加了弗里达展览在布鲁克林博物馆 - 它就像踏入这个电影

君e 3, 2020 |未注册的批评家Jaragon

爱情这一块。这些问题它会询问,你已经雄辩地把聚光灯下。在墙上?面对?觉得任何问题。我从来没有多照顾泰默作为一个艺术家(太多的想法没有纪律的自我编辑,真正把他们以上)的时刻,但我认为她在这里工作比她规范和祝强努力捕捉艺术家在屏幕上时,其他电影制片人将自己推硬。

君e 3, 2020 |注册批评家NATHANIEL [R

这款精致件促使我再次观看今晚弗里达。

君e 3, 2020 |未注册的批评家James

It should also be mentioned that funding for this movie was a notorious odyssey, even by Hollywood standards. A lot of these cameos by well-known actors in the movie were a way to secure parts of said funding and to gather interest.

Taymor的视觉情感和登泰的得分是我们访问弗里达虽然我们承认,她的故事的好莱坞版本从未真正将是一个明确对此采取的一种方式。

哈耶克做了很好的工作一样,莫利纳,但它是弗里达和她的工作,使这个每年观看我清楚的激情。仅从上述片头!

君e 3, 2020 |未注册的批评家Manny

Post发表新评论

输入你ur information below to add a new comment.

我的回答是我自己的网站»
作者电子邮件(可选):
作者URL(可选):
帖子: