Oscar History

The Film Experience™ was created by亚博主页Nathaniel R.Gemini,Cinephile,Actressexual.All material herein is written and copyrighted by Nathaniel or a member ofour teamas noted.

Powered by Squarespace
Comment Fun

Great Moments in Horror Actressing: Margot Kidder

"This genre gives actresses some really juicy lines and roles,but denies them the acclaim that comes from more 'serious' roles.Kidder was a gifted actress who was indelible in a few films."-Lady Edith

"She won a Genie for it - because Canadians have great taste!"-Mike in Canada

Keep TFE Strong

We're looking for500...no461 Patron Saints!If you read us daily,please be one.Your suscription dimes make an enormous difference.Consider...

I ♥ The Film Experience亚博主页



LULU WANG onThe Farewell


Ritesh Batra(Photograph)
Schmidt & Abrantes(Diamantino)
Wanuri Kahiu(Rafiki)
Jia Zhang-ke(Ash is Purest White)

What'cha Looking For?

Entries in Moon (3)

Jun 12 2018

Showbiz History: Anne & Ellen,Liz & Dick,Rosemary & Baby

Here's what was happening on this day in showbiz history...

1930 Jim Nabors (akaGomer Pyle) born in Alabama

1942 Anne Frank receives a diary for her 13th birthday.The diary will become world famous and receive multiple stage and film adaptations,most famously in the Oscar nominated '59 version from director George Stevens.

1963Cleopatrahas its premiere in New York City after years oftabloid sensations during the making of courtesy of Liz & Dick.Ever courting controversy,Liz & Dick did not attend the premiere!

1965 Actress Cathy Tyson (niece of Cicely!) born in Liverpool.She'll make a big splash (and receive a Golden Globe nomination) for her film debut inMona Lisawhen she's just 21...

Click to read more ...亚博足彩app

Jun 10 2016

Posterized: Duncan Jones

Duncan Jones has had a tumultuous few years so we wanted to honor him with a quick Posterized today.In January the 45 year old filmmaker lost his fatherDavid Bowie(he's the superstar's only son).His first child is due this month.His other new baby,the long-gestating video game big screen adaptationWarcraftis getting savaged by the critics.

And yet...

It wasn't so long ago that he was getting 'Hot New Director' drooling from the media,starting off strong with the sci-fi dramaMoon.His second filmSource Codewasn't as ecstatically received but performed decently.Three films isn't much to go on so we shall maintain high hopes.Do you think he will rally with a fourth film and make good on that initial promise?His next sci-fi film -- he's not straying from his preferred genre -- is calledMute,and stars Alexander Skarsgård as a silent bartender and Paul Rudd as some kind of mysterious doctor.We don't generally think of Paul Rudd as mysterious but we're willing to give it a shot.(There's some internet speculation that Sam Rockwell will reprise hisMooncharacter -- which would be very intriguing given the ending of Moon -- since Jones has indicated thatMutetakes place in the same universe.)

How many of his films have you seen?
And if you've seen the first two,are you planning to hitWarcraftdespite the reviews?

Jan 05 2012

Distant Relatives: Blade Runner and Moon

Robert here w/ Distant Relatives,exploring the connections between one classic and one contemporary film.A warning today,there are SPOILERS AHEAD for anyone who'd like to go into Moonwith as little ruined as possible
When technology gets advanced enough to make suitable replacements for humans,we're going to use them as our slaves.Right now we view the technologically sub-human as means to our needs,and why shouldn't we?We've yet to create anything sentient.But when we do,and I'm more and more convinced that it's a "when"not an "if"(in all fairness this convincing mostly has to do with people showing off their smart phones to me,but still...progress) whether we'll be filled with empathy toward our creations is not likely a given.The android and the clone aren't exactly the same thing,but they often serve the same purpose in science fiction.They're human stand-ins,whose genuine humanity is questionable.In some stories they're not advanced enough to raise the inevitable moral questions,or they're often comic relief,or exist in futures where they've already attained full equality.But frequently they are shown as created with the intent of doing the will of their tales from the point of view of humans often involve apathetic individuals coming to sympathize with them.Tales from the point of view of the clone and/or replicant can provide more dramatic introspection.In terms of point of view,both of our films today feature a little from column A and a little from column B.

At the beginning ofMoon,Sam Bell (Sam Rockwell) believes himself to be another in a long line of employees of Lunar Industries,coming to the end of his three-year-stint on the moon,looking forward with great anticipation to going home and working on mending his relationship with his wife.He's almost got it right.He is,in fact,one in a long line of clones implanted with memories,under the mistaken belief that he is the real Sam Bell,when in fact the life and wife he believes are waiting for him back on Earth have long since changed.Oh,and it's not his three-year employment contract coming to an end,it's his three-year lifespan.Blade Runnerfollows Deckard (Harrison Ford) a retired police officer who specialized in tracking down and "retiring"(if you don't know what that means,guess) replicants,or bioengineered humans.Deckard is brought in to find a collection of escaped replicants whose short life-spans are coming to an end,and in the process encounters more advanced replicants unaware even of their in-humanness.

Here we have the two most central issues to the human copies ofBlade RunnerandMoon.The first is lifespan.Dissatisfied humans don't get the opportunity to confront their creator (whoever or whatever that may be).And most world religions try to foster an attitude of thankfulness not anger.No such option from the replicants ofBlade Runnerwho,like the Sam clones of moon are questioning and attempting to comprehend their mortality.In both cases,hell hath no fury like a human copy with the desire to survive.It's the ultimate motivator,much to the detriment of their human creators and it's the central motivation that fuels both stories.The second issue to these characters is the extent which was taken to keep them from understanding their true nature.Anyone whose ever had even the slightest element of their identity revealed to them as false knows that it's a monumental shock.Imagine the entire essence of your identity being a lie,that it was engineered that way intentionally,so you could be used.It's easy to root for the Sam clones and not surprising that even the intense brutal mug ofBlade Runnerbaddie Roy Batty (Ruter Hauer) has become synonymous with that of the sympathetic villain.

And what of our heroes?InMoon,Sam begins under the belief that he's an original human and slowly comes to accept that he is a clone.We see the story through both the eyes of a human and a clone.And interestingly enough through the eyes of someone who still depends on a lesser sentient servant.Sam's computer Gertie waits on his every need.Perhaps he's not advanced enough to know otherwise.As forBlade Runner's Deckard,he also give us the point of view of both a human and a replicant,since his identity is eternally in question.Whether you believe he's human (like Harrison Ford) or a replicant (like Ridley Scott) is likely to color how you react to the film around him.But whether he's hunting down his own kind or not,it's difficult to cheer for him.

What does it mean to be human?The ultimate question asked by these two films,and ultimately unanswered,though ultimately we see more of ourselves in our copies than ourselves.It's not exactly a message but a meaningful ponderance from two films who suggest that man's long history of inhumanity will maintain itself well into the future.

Other Cinematic Relatives:Terminator 2: Judgment Day(1992),A.I.: Artificial Intelligence(2001),Never Let Me Go(2010),Rise of the Planet of the Apes(2011)